If you’ve followed my channel for any length of time, you already know where I stand on smartphones: bar phones bore me. I moved on from them a long time ago and went all-in on foldables. Book-style folds became my daily drivers, and honestly, I never looked back. Somewhere along the way, though, I developed a blind spot — flip phones.

I’ll admit it upfront: I dismissed them as gimmicks. Nostalgia devices. A modern take on the old Razr flip phones many of us carried years ago. I owned one back then and loved it — but in my mind, the modern flip felt like a step backward. Two cameras instead of three. Limited screen space. Less “serious” than a book-style fold. So I ignored them completely.

That turned out to be a mistake.

Why I Finally Gave the Flip a Chance

The turning point came when rumors started circulating about Motorola entering the book-style foldable market. That immediately caught my attention. If Motorola was serious enough to challenge Samsung and others in the book-fold space, I needed to understand what their software experience was really like — not just rely on comments claiming “Motorola software is junk.”

Instead of speculating, I did what I usually do: I tested it myself.

I picked up a Motorola Razr flip (2025 model) — the standard version — and went in expecting compromises. What I found instead was a surprisingly refined, well-thought-out device that completely changed my perspective on flip phones.

Flip Phones vs Foldables: The Reality Check

Let’s get one thing straight: foldables still represent a tiny slice of the smartphone market. In 2024, traditional bar phones accounted for roughly 98.5% of sales, while all foldables — including flips — made up just 1.5%. In 2025, that number barely moved.

But here’s the interesting part: within the foldable category, flip phones have consistently outsold book-style folds.

In 2024, flip phones held roughly 67% of foldable sales, compared to 33% for book-style folds. Even in 2025, after devices like the Z Fold 7 boosted book-fold adoption, flips still held a strong presence. That explains why Motorola stayed focused on flips for so long — and why my own move from a book fold back to a flip suddenly made sense.

First Impressions: This Doesn’t Feel Cheap

The moment I took the Razr out of the box, my assumptions fell apart. This phone doesn’t feel cheap. At all.

The hinge is solid. The screen opens flat — no bowing, no flex. The crease is minimal to the point where you barely notice it unless the light hits at just the right angle. It snaps open with confidence and closes with a satisfying click that reminds you why flip phones were fun in the first place.

And yes — hanging up a call by snapping the phone shut still feels great.

The Cover Screen Changed Everything

The real revelation is the external display. This isn’t a novelty screen anymore — it’s functional.

You can:

• Run full apps
• Read and respond to messages
• View emails
• Use face unlock or fingerprint unlock
• Take selfies with the main camera
• Even prop the phone up and watch videos

Is watching YouTube on the cover screen ideal? Not really. But having the option matters — and for quick interactions, it’s incredibly convenient.

This is where the flip starts to make sense. You don’t need to open the phone for everything. And when you do open it, you’re greeted with a 6.9-inch internal display that’s taller than even phones like the Galaxy S25 Ultra.

Big Screen When You Need It, Tiny When You Don’t

Here’s the magic of the flip: when it’s open, it’s a large phone. When it’s closed, it’s shockingly portable.

Compared to slab phones — and especially large devices like the S25 Ultra — the difference in pocket comfort is huge. It doesn’t fill your pocket. It doesn’t feel awkward when you sit down. And that portability alone explains why flip phones have remained popular.

I finally get it.

Cameras: Not the Point — And That’s Okay

Yes, this model only has two rear cameras:

• 50MP main
• Basic secondary lens
• 32MP internal selfie camera

These aren’t flagship photography tools — and that’s fine. Flip phones aren’t bought to replace pro camera systems. They’re lifestyle devices. For video calls, casual photos, vlogging, and daily use, they’re more than capable.

If you want top-tier cameras, Motorola offers the Razr Ultra with higher-end specs. The base model is about balance, not excess.

Performance, Charging, and Practicality

The base Razr uses a MediaTek chip, optimized for AI and multitasking rather than raw power. It’s smooth, responsive, and perfectly suited for this form factor. You also get:

• 30W wired charging
• 15W wireless charging
• Reliable day-to-day performance

And yes — wireless charging on a flip phone still feels like a win.

My Final Take: I Was Wrong

I’ll say it clearly: I was wrong about flip phones.

They’re not gimmicks anymore. They’re not cheap-feeling compromises. They solve real problems — portability, convenience, and usability — in ways book-style folds and slab phones simply don’t.

I’m not giving up my book fold. But I finally understand why flip phones continue to thrive — and why so many people swear by them.

Now I want to hear from you.

Are you using a flip phone today? Did you come from a fold — or a slab phone? And if you’re a Motorola Razr user, does the upcoming Motorola book fold interest you at all?

There’s a new foldable phone stepping into the ring, and this time it’s not Samsung or Google leading the charge. Motorola just made waves at CES by announcing a brand-new book-style foldable, and while many of us were hoping for a passport-style design, Motorola chose a different path. Instead of going wider, they went taller — and surprisingly, that decision might pay off.

At first glance, Motorola’s new foldable looks familiar. Think Samsung Galaxy Z Fold meets Vivo X Fold, but with just a bit more breathing room. The external display measures 6.6 inches diagonally, edging past the Z Fold’s 6.5-inch cover screen. That may not sound like much on paper, but anyone who has used these devices knows that even small changes in size can dramatically affect usability. Early comparison images suggest the Motorola is slightly taller, with more rounded corners than Samsung’s squared-off design — a subtle difference that could make it more comfortable to hold day-to-day.

Open the phone and things get even more interesting. The internal display grows to 8.1 inches, putting it in the same league as the Oppo Find N5 and making it one of the largest foldable screens currently planned. The panel is expected to be a crisp 2K display with a 120Hz refresh rate, which is right where it needs to be in 2025. Motorola isn’t chasing extreme refresh rates here — and honestly, that’s fine. Smooth, reliable performance matters more than spec-sheet flexing.

One design choice that really stands out is the addition of a third physical button. Like Vivo and Oppo before it, Motorola appears to be borrowing from Chinese foldable design trends. Alongside the power and volume buttons, there’s a programmable key likely tied to AI features, but hopefully customizable as well. Extra buttons may seem small, but they add real convenience — especially on a device designed for productivity.

The camera setup is another area where Motorola looks ready to punch above its weight. Instead of Samsung’s vertical camera strip — which causes wobble when the phone is laid flat — Motorola went with a square camera island similar to Pixel’s design, but slimmer. More importantly, the specs look strong: a 50MP main camera, a 50MP ultrawide, and a 50MP 3x telephoto lens. That alone puts it ahead of Samsung’s 10MP 3x zoom. Numbers aren’t everything, but higher resolution paired with decent sensor size usually translates to better real-world results.

Selfie cameras are solid too, with a 32MP external camera and a 20MP internal shooter. No compromises here, which is refreshing in a foldable market that often cuts corners.

Battery life could be where Motorola really separates itself. While official numbers aren’t confirmed, leaks point toward a battery around 5,200mAh — significantly larger than Samsung’s 4,400mAh pack. Considering Motorola’s Razr Ultra flip phone already outperformed Samsung in battery capacity last year, this seems believable. Even better, charging speeds are rumored to reach 90W wired and 50W wireless, putting it right alongside the fastest foldables available today.

Thickness plays a role here too. Motorola doesn’t appear to be chasing the “thinnest foldable ever” crown, and that’s a good thing. Early images suggest a slightly thicker body than the Z Fold, with more space around the USB-C port — similar to Google’s Pixel Fold. That extra thickness likely makes room for a bigger battery, better thermals, and stronger durability. Thin is impressive, but usable wins every time.

Internally, Motorola is reportedly packing 16GB of RAM, immediately jumping ahead of Samsung’s current foldables. The processor is expected to be Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 rather than the newer Elite variant, but realistically, that chip is already more than powerful enough. Choosing a slightly older flagship processor could also be the reason pricing looks competitive.

And pricing matters. Rumors suggest Motorola is targeting a $1,599–$1,699 launch price, which undercuts many competitors while still offering flagship specs. If that holds true, Motorola could land right in the sweet spot — premium without crossing into absurd territory.

Software-wise, expect Android 16 at launch, with deep AI integration. One feature already generating buzz is a “Catch Me Up” system that summarizes missed calls, messages, emails, and notifications in a single intelligent briefing. If implemented well, this could be one of those features you didn’t know you needed until you use it.

Perhaps the most exciting addition, though, is stylus support. Motorola’s foldable is expected to support a pen on both the outer and inner screens — something Samsung still hasn’t fully embraced. For note-taking, sketching, or productivity work, this alone could be a deal-breaker feature for many users. With rumors still unclear about Samsung’s future stylus plans, Motorola may have a real opportunity to win over power users.

The only downside? Timing. Motorola’s foldable isn’t expected until summer, placing it head-to-head with the next Galaxy Z Fold, Pixel Fold updates, and a wave of new Chinese foldables. Competition will be fierce — but based on what we’re seeing so far, Motorola might finally be ready to stand toe-to-toe with the giants.

So now the question is yours to answer: is this the foldable that finally pulls you away from Samsung? If Motorola delivers on these specs, pricing, and features, this could be one of the most compelling foldables we’ve seen yet.

After reading hundreds of comments across my passport-style foldable videos, one thing has become very clear: people don’t hate the idea of passport foldables at all. In fact, most of you love the concept. What you don’t agree on is what the perfect passport should actually look like.

So today, instead of guessing, I’m breaking down exactly what you have been telling me in the comments—what works, what doesn’t, and what a true “perfect” passport foldable needs to be.

It’s Not About Size — It’s About Shape

A lot of passport discussions immediately turn into “that phone is too big.” But here’s the thing: big is a vague complaint.

Tall phones like traditional bar phones can be extremely awkward to pocket. They’re narrow, sure—but they’re long, top-heavy, and hard to grip. On the other hand, wider passport-style devices aren’t necessarily harder to carry. They’re just shaped differently.

In fact, when you compare how these devices fit in a pouch, the wider passport format actually works better. It slides in easily, is easier to grab, and doesn’t feel like it’s wedged in place the way tall phones often do. For me personally, that wider shape is more practical day-to-day.

Why People Loved the Original Passport-Style Phones

Scrolling through your comments, a few names kept popping up again and again: the Surface Duo, the original Pixel Fold, and the Oppo Find N. Why? Because they nailed something modern foldables drifted away from—reachability.

Shorter phones are easier to use one-handed. Typing feels better because the keyboard keys are wider. Your thumb doesn’t have to stretch as far, and overall the device feels more balanced. That’s something people genuinely miss.

Cover Screen: This Is Where Passport Phones Shine

On the cover display, passport phones are simply more pleasant to use. You can see more content without scrolling, videos feel less cramped, and everything just looks more natural.

Yes, tall bar phones can show more content vertically—but when it comes to watching videos or browsing casually, the passport’s wider screen wins on comfort. Even when you rotate a bar phone sideways, it still doesn’t quite match the usable surface of a true passport format.

And remember—those thick black bars you see on older devices won’t exist on modern passport foldables. New designs will be edge-to-edge.

Inside Display: Bigger Than You Think

This is where a lot of people misunderstand passport foldables. When opened properly in landscape mode, a passport foldable actually delivers more usable video space than traditional book-style foldables.

When you compare it side-by-side with a tablet, the passport format lands surprisingly close—just shorter and easier to hold. The result is a device that feels more like a compact tablet than a stretched phone.

And that’s exactly what many of you want.

Multitasking? You’re Covered

Another big concern I see in the comments is multitasking. The good news: passport foldables won’t be limited here.

For most people—realistically over 90%—two-app multitasking is enough. Browsing on one side, shopping or messaging on the other. Passport foldables handle this beautifully thanks to their wider layout.

Sure, some devices allow three or four apps at once—but that’s more novelty than necessity. In real-world use, passport foldables check the multitasking box just fine.

Sound, Battery, and the Features You Actually Want

This part comes up constantly in your comments, and I agree with you completely.

If manufacturers are going to build a wider phone, there’s no excuse for weak speakers. The ideal passport foldable should have four speakers, delivering true stereo sound in both portrait and landscape.

Battery life is another huge one. A narrow book-style foldable squeezing in a 4,400 mAh battery just doesn’t cut it anymore. Passport phones have more internal space—use it. We want 5,800 mAh, 6,000 mAh, or better, paired with modern battery tech.

And charging? Give us at least 45–60W wired charging, fast wireless charging, and proper magnetic alignment. MagSafe-style support isn’t a luxury anymore—it’s expected.

Pen Support and a Stable Design Matter

Many of you also want pen support—and that means the phone has to lay flat. A wobbly camera bump ruins the experience.

The solution is obvious: a horizontal camera bar across the back. It stabilizes the phone, improves usability with a pen, and just makes sense. Vertical camera stacks need to go—especially on devices meant to double as tablets.

Cameras: No More Compromises

This one matters. Passport foldables shouldn’t be treated as “secondary” devices. They deserve flagship cameras, full stop.

No downgrades. No excuses. If the technology fits in other foldables, it can fit here too.

Don’t Price It Out of the Market

Finally, pricing. Foldables already occupy a tiny slice of the smartphone market. Pricing passport foldables out of reach would kill them before they even get a chance.

People want premium—but not absurd. Competitive pricing could actually grow the foldable category instead of shrinking it.

So… Did We Get It Right?

The perfect passport foldable, according to you, is wide but comfortable, powerful but practical, packed with features without being overpriced. Great screens inside and out, real battery life, proper cameras, pen support, and thoughtful design.

Now I want to hear from you—did this cover everything you’ve been asking for? Is there something critical I missed? Or did a new idea pop up that deserves attention?

Drop your thoughts in the comments, and as always, thanks for being part of the conversation.

Samsung’s S26 series has been leaking like crazy, but instead of giving us clarity, the rumors have created one of the strangest, most confusing upgrade cycles Samsung has ever attempted. New chipsets that aren’t really new. Camera changes that don’t change much. A mysterious fourth phone that seems to exist “just because.” And a processor naming scheme that might make your brain hurt.

Grab your coffee—this one’s a ride.

The Chipset Circus: Snapdragon Elite 5… or Exynos 2600?

Let’s start with the biggest question Samsung fans always have:

“Are we getting Snapdragon or Exynos this time?”

Well—yes.
And no.
And maybe?

Early tests suggest Samsung wants to put its new Exynos 2600 in most S26 and S26+ units. Some benchmarks show it beating Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 Elite. Others show the opposite. So Samsung seems torn.

Here’s where it gets messy:
In most markets, Samsung may use Exynos in the S26 and S26+, but Snapdragon Elite 5 in the S26 Ultra.

Why?
Simple. Marketing separation.
The Plus model has gotten too close to the Ultra in the last two generations. Samsung needs space to justify the Ultra’s higher price.

But here’s the twist—
Leaks say in the United States and a few other regions, ALL models may get Snapdragon Elite 5. Honestly, it’s what Samsung should do globally, but we’ll see if they pull the trigger.

Either way, the naming is funny.
This chip should technically be Elite 2, but Qualcomm decided “Gen 5 Elite” sounded fancier. Silicon branding never disappoints.

The Design: Familiar Faces with One Big Mystery

If you’ve seen the S25 series… you’ve basically seen the S26 series.

Except for one phone.

A strange-looking device has leaked with a full-width camera bar across the top—similar to Pixel’s visor or the iPhone 15 Pro’s clean slab look.

So what is it?

• Is it the returning S26 Edge model?
• Or did Samsung remove a camera from the base S26 to cut costs?
• Or is it just a test unit we weren’t supposed to see?

At this stage, rumors point strongly to the S26 Edge returning, complete with:

• A bigger 4300 mAh battery
• A new premium back design
• The unmistakable camera bar spanning the width of the phone

It’s an odd move considering the S25 Edge didn’t exactly sell well. But Samsung seems determined to try again—maybe hoping the design gives it a new identity.

Cameras: Upgrades… Kind Of

If you were hoping Samsung would finally trickle down that beautiful 200-megapixel Ultra camera to the regular S series—well, sit down.

It’s not happening.

The S26 and S26+ are getting:

• 50MP main camera
• 50MP ultrawide
• New 12MP 3× telephoto

This year the 12MP ultra wide is getting a big upgrade and that new 3× lens is definitely a nice upgrade over the cheap 10MP one they’ve used for four years, but it still leaves Samsung trailing behind Apple and Pixel, both of which have 48–50MP 5× zoom lenses.

Meanwhile, the S26 Ultra keeps its throne with:

• 200MP main
• 50MP ultrawide
• 50MP 5× zoom
• Possible new 12MP 3× zoom

So yes, the Ultra is still king. The smaller S26 models… remain stuck in “good enough” territory.

Battery & Charging: Small Gains, Same Mistakes

There is good news:
Every S26 model is rumored to get 200–300 mAh more battery.
Always welcome.

And charging?
Well…

• Standard S26 models: probably still 25W
• Ultra: still 45W
• Wireless charging: maybe increasing from 15W → 20W

But the rumor that caught everyone’s attention?

Samsung might finally add MagSafe-compatible coils to the S26 lineup. If that happens, we enter a glorious new world where accessories actually work the same across devices.

We can dream.

The “Why” Behind All of This

Here’s the point—and what your video script was highlighting perfectly:

The S26 series is shaping up to be the definition of an incremental upgrade.
Battery up a bit.
Cameras improved slightly.
Chipset split again.
Design mostly unchanged.

If you skipped the S25?
The S26 might feel like a refinement you can justify.

If you have an S25?
You might struggle to find a reason to upgrade unless you’re going for the Ultra.

And the Edge model?
That’s the wildcard. It might be Samsung’s attempt to shake up the mid-tier lineup, or it may be another experiment that fizzles.

Final Thoughts: Should You Be Excited?

If you love Samsung devices, the S26 series still brings improvements—just not the “wow factor” we’ve seen in previous generations. To many users, it’ll feel like Samsung is saving the real innovations for the Z Fold 8 and their upcoming AI push.

Still, the S26 series gives you:

• Better zoom on standard models
• A new premium Edge design
• Larger batteries
• Possibly uniform Snapdragon chips in the U.S.
• And a more polished Ultra

Now it’s your turn—are you excited for the S26?
Did you skip the S25 waiting for this moment?
Or are you holding out for something bigger?

Drop a comment and let me know what you think!

And if you want to compare Samsung’s last big release, check out my S25 Ultra vs Z Fold 7 comparison—linked right on the blog.

In the world of mobile editing, there’s always the ongoing debate about which device delivers the best performance—especially when it comes to multitasking and processing power. I’ve always loved using foldables for editing because of their larger screens and flexibility, but recently, I decided to add another contender to the ring: the iPad Pro M5. With its M5 chip promising to take mobile processing to the next level, I was eager to see how it would stack up against today’s top foldables, like the Honor Magic V5 and the Vivo X Fold 5. Could the iPad’s large, stunning display compete with the foldables’ multitasking capabilities? Let’s dive into the results!

The iPad Pro M5 vs. Foldables: Design and Multitasking

When it comes to design, the iPad Pro M5 has a clear advantage with its large, beautiful screen, which is perfect for multitasking and editing. But how do the foldables compare? The Honor Magic V5 and Vivo X Fold 5 both feature impressive foldable displays, which offer a larger surface for multitasking in tablet mode, giving them an edge in this area. But the iPad is known for its smooth workflow, and I wanted to see just how it compared when both the Honor Magic V5 and Vivo X Fold 5 are unfolded.

Starting with multitasking, both foldables shine here. On the Honor Magic V5, multitasking is a breeze, allowing you to run multiple apps side by side with ease. Similarly, the Vivo X Fold 5 also offers smooth multitasking and supports up to four apps running at once when using Work Bench. The iPad Pro M5, however, requires a bit more effort. While you can run apps side by side, similar to that of Work Bench it isn’t as intuitive. It requires a long press and drag to place apps into split-screen mode, which, compared to the foldables, feels clunkier.

Performance: iPad Pro M5 vs. Foldables

Next, let’s talk about performance. The iPad Pro M5 is powered by Apple’s M5 chip, which is one of the fastest mobile processors around. So, I wanted to see how well it held up against the Honor Magic V5 and Vivo X Fold 5. To test this, I used a video editing app called InShot to process a 4K video and see how quickly each device could export it.

Surprisingly, the iPad Pro M5 didn’t blow the foldables out of the water as I had expected. Despite being equipped with Apple’s fastest chip, the iPad Pro was slower to process the video than both the Honor Magic V5 and Vivo X Fold 5, with the Vivo X Fold 5 finishing first. In fact, the iPad lagged behind, even with its superior chip. The Honor Magic V5 and Vivo X Fold 5 both delivered excellent results, showing that they can handle demanding tasks just as well as, if not better than, the iPad.

Camera Performance: Apple vs. Android

When it comes to cameras, the iPad Pro M5 is undeniably impressive, but it’s not quite a match for the Honor Magic V5 or Vivo X Fold 5 when it comes to versatility. The iPad Pro M5 has good cameras for a tablet, but they aren’t designed for the same level of detail and precision as the Honor Magic V5 and Vivo X Fold 5. In my test shots, I found that the Vivo X Fold 5 performed better, offering clear and detailed images, especially in low-light conditions. The Honor Magic V5 came close, but the iPad Pro M5 still held its own with its crisp shots and improved image stabilization.

Customization and Flexibility

One of the key strengths of foldables like the Honor Magic V5 and Vivo X Fold 5 is their customization and flexibility. For example, the Honor Magic V5 allows you to stack widgets and customize the home screen extensively. The Vivo X Fold 5 offers a “workbench” feature that allows you to run four apps simultaneously, which is incredibly useful for those who need to juggle multiple tasks. The iPad Pro M5, on the other hand, offers limited customization options compared to these foldables, and apps are not as flexible in terms of layout.

Final Thoughts: Is the iPad Pro M5 Really Necessary?

After all of these tests, my conclusion is clear: while the iPad Pro M5 offers a beautiful, large screen and superb performance for certain tasks, it’s not necessarily the go-to device for mobile editing anymore. The Honor Magic V5 and Vivo X Fold 5 both provide incredible multitasking abilities and a smooth workflow for editing, which makes them great alternatives to the iPad for productivity on the go. That said, the iPad Pro would be preferred for is size and app compatibility for full form editing programs like DaVinci Resolve.

So, while the iPad Pro M5 is still a powerhouse in its own right, foldables might just be the future of mobile productivity. What do you think? Will foldables take the lead, or does the iPad Pro M5 still reign supreme? Let me know your thoughts in the comments!

When it comes to foldables, two devices are standing out as my favorite daily carriers: the Honor Magic V5 and the Pixel 10 Pro Fold. They both offer impressive features, but what sets them apart? Let’s dive into the details of these devices and explore why they’re my go-to phones.

First, let’s talk about the look and feel of these foldables. When placed side by side, you’ll notice that the Honor Magic V5 is significantly thinner than the Pixel 10 Pro Fold. The thinner profile of the Honor makes it feel lighter and more comfortable to hold throughout the day. On the other hand, the Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a heftier feel, but it’s still manageable. Both devices have large camera bumps, with the Honor Magic V5 sporting a notably bigger bump, which contributes to its bulkier feel.

In terms of screen size, both phones are pretty much identical with an 8-inch internal display. However, the Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a slightly wider design, giving it a bit more space to work with. But when it comes to actual usability, they feel quite similar in your hand. The experience is smooth on both devices, and they handle apps with ease. I love using the Google Keyboard on both phones, especially for accurate text-to-speech and typing.

Performance-wise, AI integration on both devices is top-notch. Both phones handle AI-powered tasks like rephrasing text and proofreading with ease. You’ll notice that the Pixel 10 Pro Fold is just a hair faster at processing these tasks, but overall, they perform identically. This makes both devices very efficient for my daily needs, whether I’m responding to comments or typing out emails.

Moving to the internal screens, the Pixel’s 8-inch display feels more secure when placed flat, whereas the Honor Magic V5 is a bit wobbly. However, the Honor wins points for its customizability. The Magic V5 offers more flexibility with app sizes and widgets, allowing for a more tailored user experience. This is where the Honor Magic V5 pulls ahead, giving me greater control over my interface compared to the more rigid Pixel 10 Pro Fold.

Camera performance is where the two really start to differ. Both devices have impressive sensors, but the Honor Magic V5 tends to add more saturation to images, whereas the Pixel 10 Pro Fold leans toward a more natural, subdued look. The Pixel’s camera tends to perform better in terms of clarity, especially in low-light conditions. However, if you prefer brighter, more vibrant photos, the Honor Magic V5 might be the way to go.

As for the user interface, the Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a cleaner, simpler approach, but the lack of customization can feel limiting. In contrast, the Honor Magic V5’s more flexible UI lets you stack widgets and move apps around with ease, providing a more dynamic experience. It’s little touches like this that make the Honor Magic V5 more enjoyable for long-term use.

When it comes to battery life, the Pixel 10 Pro Fold comes with a 4600mAh battery, while the Honor Magic V5 has a slightly larger 5000mAh battery. Both foldables perform well for a full day of use, but the Honor Magic V5 gives me a bit more peace of mind when it comes to lasting through the day without needing to top-up. Both phones support fast charging, with the Pixel offering a 30W wired charging speed, and the Honor Magic V5 supporting 40W wired charging.

Finally, let’s talk about security. The Pixel 10 Pro Fold has face ID recognition, which is super convenient for unlocking your phone, especially when accessing sensitive apps like banking or passwords. In comparison, the Honor Magic V5 relies on a fingerprint scanner, which is just as secure but doesn’t offer the convenience of facial recognition.

Service and support are another consideration. Since the Pixel 10 Pro Fold is readily available in the U.S., it comes with excellent warranty support and customer service from Google. Unfortunately, the Honor Magic V5 isn’t as widely available outside of China, meaning support might be harder to come by, especially if you run into issues with your device.

At the end of the day, both the Honor Magic V5 and the Pixel 10 Pro Fold are excellent choices for daily use. They each have their strengths: the Honor offers a more customizable experience and better battery life, while the Pixel excels in camera clarity, ease of use, and security features. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference. For me, both devices fit perfectly into my daily routine, and I carry both with me everywhere I go.

Which foldable do you prefer? Are you team Pixel 10 Pro Fold, or do you lean towards the flexibility of the Honor Magic V5? Let me know in the comments!

In the fast-paced world of foldable phones, 2026 is already shaping up to be an exciting year, with Oppo leading the charge with its upcoming Oppo Find N6. But with the OnePlus Open potentially following suit, is the market ready for another foldable phone launch? Let’s dive into what we can expect from Oppo’s new foldable, how it stacks up to its predecessors, and what it means for the competition.

Oppo Find N6: What’s New?

For those who may not be familiar, the Oppo Find N5 was one of the standout foldables from the previous year. It was one of the largest in the market, boasting an impressive 8.12-inch internal screen and a 6.6-inch external display. While it wasn’t the most compact foldable out there, it brought some much-needed innovation to the category with its slim design and decent battery life. However, it did have its shortcomings — particularly in the camera department, where the Oppo Find N5’s 50 MP main sensor and 8 MP ultrawide camera were a bit underwhelming compared to other foldables in the market.

But the Oppo Find N6 is shaping up to remedy those shortcomings. It’s rumored to come with a Snapdragon Elite 5 chipset, an upgrade from the previous model’s Snapdragon 7-series, and significantly better camera specs, including a 50 MP periscope zoom lens, alongside a multi-spectral sensor for better light capture in low-light conditions. Oppo seems to be listening to consumer feedback and coming back strong with a device that could finally compete with the likes of Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 7 and the Honor Magic V5.

What About the OnePlus Open?

It’s also worth mentioning that the OnePlus Open, Oppo’s sister company, may be entering the foldable scene soon as well. The OnePlus Open skipped a release in 2025, leaving many wondering whether they’d be returning to the foldable market in 2026. OnePlus may not be as well-known in the foldable space as Samsung, but they do have a reputation for making solid phones at a competitive price point.

The question is: will OnePlus release the Open 2, Open 3, or something entirely new to rival Oppo’s new flagship? Speculation suggests that OnePlus may release a global version of the Oppo Find N6, which could be a game-changer for foldable competition, particularly in markets like the U.S. where Oppo’s foldables haven’t yet gained a foothold. A global version of the Find N6 would be the perfect opportunity for OnePlus to capture a broader audience and take on Samsung in the foldable space.

Oppo Find N6: A Premium Experience?

When comparing the Oppo Find N6 to the previous model, the improvements are noticeable. The new N6 is rumored to have a 6000 mAh battery, which is on par with some of the best foldables out there, including the Vivo X Fold 5. For those looking for longevity, Oppo has upped its game with a battery capable of handling long days of use without a hitch.

On top of that, Oppo is expected to include fast charging capabilities with 80W wired charging and 40W wireless charging. Compare that to the Pixel Fold’s slow charging speed, and you can see why the Oppo Find N6 could be an appealing choice for anyone tired of waiting for their phone to charge.

The Camera Upgrade

One of the biggest selling points of the Oppo Find N6 is its improved camera system. The previous model fell short of expectations with an underwhelming ultrawide camera and average selfie performance. However, Oppo is stepping it up this year with a rumored 50 MP main sensor and a 50 MP periscope zoom camera — a big jump from the N5’s lackluster camera setup.

Oppo isn’t just focusing on the hardware either. They’re introducing a multi-spectral sensor, which will allow the camera to capture more light and detail in challenging lighting conditions. This could make the Oppo Find N6 a serious contender for photography enthusiasts who demand high-quality camera performance from their foldables.

Will It Compete With Samsung?

The Oppo Find N6 will face stiff competition from Samsung’s foldables, especially the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which is already known for its polished hardware and cutting-edge features. However, with Oppo’s commitment to upgrading its camera system and battery life, it may be able to steal some market share from Samsung, especially with the Find N6’s rumored slim design and improved specs.

Samsung has been the undisputed leader in the foldable market for years, but Oppo’s Find N series is a legitimate contender. The fact that Oppo is also focusing on the same high-end specs as the Z Fold series, such as large displays, fast charging, and premium build quality, means that foldable users now have more choice than ever before.

OnePlus: Is It Coming Back to Foldables?

So, what does all this mean for OnePlus? While it’s not clear yet what the company will do next with its foldable lineup, it’s safe to say that OnePlus has the potential to be a strong player in the foldable space. If the rumors are true, and OnePlus does release a new foldable in 2026, we can expect it to come with similar specs as the Oppo Find N6, but at a potentially lower price point.

OnePlus may even surprise us with a global version of the Oppo Find N6, giving consumers more choices in the foldable market. If they manage to release a device that rivals the Oppo Find N6 — especially in markets outside of China — it could mark the beginning of a new era for OnePlus in the foldable space.

Conclusion

The Oppo Find N6 is shaping up to be an impressive device, with a large display, improved camera system, and better battery life than its predecessor. But the real question remains: Is the world ready for another foldable phone? With the current market still dominated by traditional bar phones, will people be willing to embrace another foldable device, especially one with a second hinge?

It’ll be interesting to see how Oppo’s Find N6 fares against Samsung and other foldables in 2026, and whether OnePlus will throw its hat into the ring with its own foldable offering. One thing’s for sure: foldable phones are evolving, and the Oppo Find N6 is pushing the envelope even further.

So, what do you think? Are you excited for the Oppo Find N6, or will you be waiting for OnePlus’ next move? Let me know in the comments below!

If you’ve ever tried to enjoy your favorite playlist and still hear what’s going on around you, you know the struggle is real. Traditional in-ear earbuds sound great, but they plug your ears, get uncomfortable, and make you shout like you’re on a runway. That’s exactly why open-ear, clip-style earbuds exist—and today we’ve got two from SOUNDPEATS on the table: the Pearl Clips and the Clip 1.

I spent time unboxing, setting up, and actually living with both of these, and there were a few surprises—especially in the sound department. Let’s walk through what they’re like to use, how they sound, and which pair might be the better fit for you.

Meet the SOUNDPEATS Pearl Clips

The Pearl Clips are open-ear, clip-on earbuds designed for people who want audio and awareness. Instead of being shoved into your ear canal, they hook around your ear and rest just outside the ear, so your ears stay open and your surroundings stay audible.

Unboxing and First Impressions

Inside the box you get:

The Pearl Clips in a compact charging case A short USB-A to USB-C charging cable The usual paperwork

The case is small, pocket-friendly, and charges via USB-C on the back. Pop the lid, peel off the protective plastic, and you’re greeted with two sleek, lightweight clips that look a little like minimal, futuristic earrings.

When you put them on, the speaker portion rests near your ear opening while the arm wraps around the back of your ear. The clip is secure but not tight—they stay in place without pinching.

Right away, two things stood out:

Comfort – They’re extremely light and don’t create that plugged-ear feeling. You don’t hear your own voice booming inside your head. Awareness – Even with both on, I could still hear the room and my own voice naturally.

These are the kind of earbuds you could realistically wear for hours without your ears getting sore.

Battery Life & App Features (Pearl Clips)

On paper, the Pearl Clips are very respectable:

10-minute charge → about 2 hours of listening Up to 24 hours of total playback with the case

That’s more than enough for a commute, workday, or long walk, especially if you drop them back in the case between sessions.

Inside the SOUNDPEATS app, you get:

Battery levels for each earbud and the case Preset EQ modes (Classic, Treble, Bass Boost, etc.) An adaptive EQ hearing test that plays tones and builds a sound profile based on what you can and can’t hear

During that test there were a couple of frequencies I couldn’t hear, and the app adjusted the sound to compensate. It’s simple, but genuinely useful—especially if your hearing isn’t perfectly even across all frequencies.

No active noise cancelling here (which makes sense—they’re open-ear), but for walking, workouts, or general daily use, ANC isn’t the point. Awareness is.

How the Pearl Clips Sound

Now for the fun part.

I connected them to my phone, opened YouTube Music, and hit play on some relaxing 80s—starting with “Africa” by Toto. I expected “good for open-ear” sound.

What I got was “wow.”

The audio is clear The highs and mids are clean The bass is shockingly strong for earbuds that don’t actually seal your ear

At about three-quarters volume, they were loud. Turned up near max, I could barely hear myself talking over the music, even though my ears were technically still “open.” For open-ear earbuds, that’s pretty impressive.

Honestly, I prefer the sound of these over some traditional in-ear buds I’ve used—including big names like Samsung Buds and Apple’s AirPods. That surprised me.

Controls live on the part that rests near your ear:

Double-tap to play/pause Long press for next/previous track Swipe for volume up/down

They’re a bit sensitive, but once you learn the gestures, they’re very usable.

They’re also sweat and water resistant, so they’re safe for workouts, light rain, and everyday use—just don’t go swimming with them.

Enter the Clip 1: The “Big Brother” Earbuds

If the Pearl Clips are the “everyday open-ear buds,” the Clip 1 are their more serious, high-resolution sibling.

Design and Case

Right away, you notice:

The case is larger, with a bigger internal battery The earbuds themselves have a slightly beefier design with a more pronounced battery section

But despite the bigger size, they still feel light and comfortable on the ear, very similar in comfort to the Pearl Clips.

One very cool quality-of-life feature:

You can drop each earbud into either side of the case and it will still charge correctly. The left/right mapping adjusts automatically, so you don’t have to carefully line them up or think about which is which.

Battery & Features

This is where the Clip 1 really pulls ahead:

Up to 40 hours of total listening with the case (vs 24 hours on the Pearl Clips) In-ear detection – music pauses when you take them off Dual-device connection – pair to, say, your laptop and your phone at the same time. Listen to music on the computer, answer calls on your phone. Support for LDAC high-resolution audio Dolby Audio / Dolby Mobile modes in the app for enhanced sound

Think of these as the “pro audio” version of the Pearl Clips—but without actually being called “Pro.”

How the Clip 1 Sound

Once I fired up the Clip 1, the difference was clear:

All the good things about the Pearl Clips’ sound—clarity, detail, and punch—are still here, but the bass gets an extra boost and the overall sound feels richer.

With LDAC and the high-res tuning:

Bass hits harder and deeper Vocals stay clear Overall sound feels more “full” and immersive

If you’re particular about audio quality and really want that CD-like, high-resolution experience from an open-ear design, the Clip 1 is the better match.

Controls are similar but with a larger touch area:

Double-tap to play/pause Triple-tap to skip tracks Long presses and taps for other functions depending on your setup in the app

The bigger “paddle” section on the Clip 1 makes those gestures easier and more forgiving than on the smaller Pearl Clips.

Pearl Clips vs Clip 1: Which Should You Buy?

Both sets share some key strengths:

Open-ear comfort you can wear for hours Great awareness of your surroundings Solid sound quality (especially for open-ear) Sweat/water resistance

But they’re aimed at slightly different people:

Get the Pearl Clips if:

You have smaller ears or want the smallest, lightest feeling option You want something simple, comfortable, and great-sounding for walks, podcasts, and casual listening 24 hours of total battery life is more than enough for your routine

Get the Clip 1 if:

You care about audio quality first You like stronger bass and LDAC high-res audio support You want longer battery life (up to 40 hours total) You like conveniences like in-ear detection and dual-device connection

Shared Downsides

Neither case supports wireless charging There’s no active noise cancelling (by design—they’re open-ear)

But honestly, at around a third of the price of many big-brand earbuds, both of these deliver a lot of value—especially if comfort and awareness are high on your list.

Final Thoughts

I’ve used a lot of earbuds over the years, from Samsung to Apple to all kinds of budget brands. These SOUNDPEATS clip-style buds genuinely surprised me.

The Pearl Clips are fantastic everyday, open-ear earbuds with comfort and sound that punch way above their size. The Clip 1 takes that formula and turns it up a notch with better bass, LDAC support, smarter features, and marathon battery life.

If you’re shopping for yourself—or looking for a great gift, especially around Black Friday—either of these would make an awesome pick. Just decide whether you care more about ultimate comfort and compactness (Pearl Clips) or maximum sound quality and battery life (Clip 1). Check our Products page Here

Have you tried clip-on or open-ear earbuds before? Would you switch from traditional in-ear buds for comfort like this? Let me know—I’d love to hear your experience and what you’re using today.

ENTER TO WIN HERE!

Here’s how:

Official Rules & Disclaimer

1. No Purchase Necessary: Entry is free via the requirements stated in the video and this form.

2. Liability Waiver: GOTgoodoldtech and its creators are providing the hardware “as-is.” We are not responsible for any damage caused to your computer, loss of data, or personal injury resulting from the installation or use of this prize. The winner assumes all risk associated with the DIY installation.

3. Warranty: No warranty is provided by GOTgoodoldtech. Any manufacturer warranty (if applicable) is the responsibility of the winner to pursue with the SSD manufacturer.

4. Selection: Winner will be chosen once the video reaches 1,000 comments, 1,000 likes, and 20,000 views. The winner will be contacted via the email provided.

5. YouTube Disclaimer: This giveaway is not sponsored, endorsed, or administered by YouTube or Apple Inc.

6. Final Required Question:”By checking this box, I agree to the Official Rules and the Liability Waiver stated above.

Enter Here

Dual folds finally got good. So why are manufacturers suddenly obsessed with trifolds? Are they truly the next big leap in mobile innovation—or just another hinge we didn’t ask for? Stick around, because by the end of this read, you might be asking the same question I am: Do we really need a tablet in our pocket twice over?

---

Foldables Have Come a Long Way

Remember when foldables first appeared? They were clunky, fragile, and felt more like prototypes than phones. Devices like the Microsoft Surface Duo looked promising but didn’t stick around long enough to build trust. Fast-forward five years, and we’ve gone from those early experiments to polished masterpieces like the Samsung Z Fold, Honor Magic V5, Vivo X Fold 5, and the Pixel 10 Pro Fold.

Today’s foldables aren’t fragile novelties—they’re powerhouses. They run faster, last longer, and in many ways outperform their bar-phone cousins. Even Apple is finally jumping in, and when Apple enters a category, that’s a clear sign it’s here to stay.

But here’s the reality check: foldables still only hold about 2% of the smartphone market, while 98% of users stick to traditional bar phones. We just convinced people to trust one hinge—and now the industry wants us to trust two?

---

From Folds to Trifolds: Are We Ready?

Think about it. It took half a decade to evolve from this—[Surface Duo]—to this—the ultra-thin Honor Magic V5. We finally reached a point where foldables are sleek, durable, and even IP68 water-resistant. That kind of progress built real consumer confidence.

So, why start the trust process over again with a second hinge?

Manufacturers claim the trifold will give you “a tablet in your pocket.” But haven’t we heard that before? Back in the day, the Galaxy Note was literally called a “phablet”—a phone and tablet in one. It had a huge 6.3-inch screen and a stylus, and people said it was too big. Fast-forward, and we’re all carrying 6.7-inch phones. Funny how that worked out.

Now they’re trying to sell us a new version of that same dream—a 10-inch “tablet phone” that folds in three.

---

Do We Really Need a Tablet That Folds Twice?

Here’s my honest take: we already have a tablet in our pocket.

Ever since foldables like the Z Fold and Magic V5 arrived, my tablet—an old Galaxy Tab S7—has been collecting dust. I only use it occasionally as a side display. Foldables replaced tablets for many of us because they’re compact, powerful, and plenty big when opened.

So what niche are trifolds trying to fill? A 10-inch foldable tablet sounds nice, but picture yourself holding it mid-flight or on a train. It’s not exactly a one-hand device anymore. Sure, it might be slightly lighter than a real tablet—but after 10 minutes, you’ll want to set it down. And if you’re going to set it on a table to use it, why not just buy an actual tablet?

Even battery life doesn’t justify it. Early rumors suggest Samsung’s upcoming Galaxy G-Fold (Trifold) will pack around 5500 mAh, barely more than most dual folds today. My Magic V5, for example, already hits 5820 mAh, and it’ll likely outlast that trifold despite having fewer moving parts.

---

Bigger Screens, Bigger Problems

Now, let’s talk practicality. The promise of “more multitasking” on a 10-inch screen sounds great—until you realize how awkward it is to type on something that wide. A larger screen doesn’t automatically mean a better experience, especially if it becomes harder to hold, type, or use without a flat surface.

And the design? Let’s just say early trifold prototypes don’t look reassuring. Misaligned edges, visible gaps, and questionable durability—things we thought we’d left behind with first-gen foldables—are creeping back in.

Add to that the price problem. When the Z Fold 7 already costs around $2,000, what’s a trifold going to run? $3,000? $3,500? For that price, you could buy a flagship phone and a top-tier tablet—and still have money left for a smartwatch.

---

Innovation or Inflation?

Here’s what I suspect: the trifold isn’t about giving us more—it’s about charging us more. As Apple gears up to launch its first foldable, other brands want to look like they’re one step ahead. “Apple’s doing dual folds? Fine, we’ll do trifolds!”

It’s marketing chess, not consumer demand. No one’s been asking for this. We’ve just started trusting one hinge—don’t rush us into two.

---

Final Thoughts

I’m not anti-trifold. I’m just asking: who actually needs it?

We’ve reached a beautiful balance with current dual folds—devices that deliver tablet-like functionality in your pocket. They’re fast, durable, and refined. Trifolds, on the other hand, feel like a solution in search of a problem.

Maybe they’ll surprise us. Maybe in a few years they’ll be thinner, cheaper, and make sense. But right now? It feels like another “next big thing” that’s more about headlines than user needs.

So, are trifolds truly progress—or just another price hike wrapped in a new hinge?
You tell me.